Lantern

Grade D

Tap a star to rate

A circumvention tool from a nonprofit

Lantern presents itself as a tool for getting past internet blocking rather than as a conventional privacy VPN. Its homepage headline is "Unlock the full internet", a banner above it reads "Better than a VPN", and the copy says "Lantern is more than a VPN" and is "designed to overcome the toughest internet restrictions". The footer names the operator: "Copyright © 2026 Brave New Software Project, A 501c3 nonprofit". The homepage claims that over 150 million people "trust Lantern", a figure the site gives without a date or a source.

On who can get it, the homepage links downloads for Android, iOS, Windows, Mac and Linux, both in its "Stay connected across all of your devices" section and in the footer. It does not say which app stores carry the apps or whether the files come from the site itself, and it names no country the service is or is not offered in. No price, plan or currency appears anywhere on the homepage. What does appear is a banner that says "Lantern needs your help" and "Your donation powers a censorship-free internet for millions of people", with a Donate Now button, and the footer links both Donate and Donate Cryptocurrency pages. The footer also links a Resellers page, which the homepage does not explain. The site does not say whether any part of the service is paid, and it does not spell out how the service is funded beyond the donation appeal.

Logging, audit and the organization behind it

The site does not name an independent audit of its logging policy. The only statement about logging on the homepage is a short one under "No Logs": "Lantern's no-log policy means we don't collect data that could be used to identify you." That is the provider's claim, and the homepage does not say what data it does collect, for how long, or whether account details or payment records from any paid channel are kept. The footer links a Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, a DMCA page and a Transparency Report, so more detail may sit behind those links, but the homepage itself gives only that one sentence on logging and nothing about the contents of the transparency report.

The operator is named in the footer as Brave New Software Project and described there as a 501c3 nonprofit. The homepage does not say where the organization is based or registered, does not name its directors or funders, and does not mention any parent company or related brand. It says Lantern works in "close collaboration with leading academic technologists", without naming them. Footer links to a Mission page, Careers, a Censorship-Circumvention SDK and a product called Unbounded show that the organization does more than ship one app, but the homepage does not describe those projects.

How the service says it gets through

The homepage explains Lantern by contrasting it with traditional VPNs. It argues that those "are easy to detect, making it straightforward for network monitors to block them" and that they "rely on a limited set of IP addresses that service providers or governments can easily restrict". Lantern's answer, as the site states it, has three parts.

The first is scale. The site says Lantern's network has "over 50,000 IP addresses" and that "We shuffle your IP address regularly" so that the connection stays up. The second is disguise. Under "Blend in with stealth Protocols", the site says Lantern's "rigorously tested, evolving set of open-source protocols blend in with regular internet traffic", which it says keeps use of the service "discreet and effective". The homepage does not name the protocols, publish their source repositories, or say how they are tested. The third is sourcing. The site says Lantern "sources premium IPs from trusted providers", without naming the providers.

The features list adds one-click connection "designed for simplicity", and split tunneling that lets users choose which apps go through Lantern or let the service "automatically choose which apps to unblock". On speed, the homepage claims that Lantern's "advanced protocols cut through congestion to deliver faster connection speeds than traditional VPNs" and that it "outperforms other VPNs in the face of tough network restrictions", but it publishes no measurements to back either claim.

The site does not list server locations or countries, does not describe the encryption it uses, and does not mention a kill switch, streaming services or torrenting. It speaks of access to "anything from anywhere" but never names a country where it says the service works, so readers inside a particular censored network have only the general claim to go on.

Practical detail the homepage gives

Because the homepage shows no price, it also shows no plan lengths, no renewal terms, no refund or trial terms and no device limit. The download list covers Android, iOS, Windows, Mac and Linux. Support runs through the footer's Support and FAQ links and two contact email addresses listed there; the homepage mentions no live chat or phone line. The testimonials section reproduces short user posts praising the app, which are user opinions rather than the provider's own statements. Donations can be made by the standard route or in cryptocurrency, going by the footer links, though the homepage does not list the currencies or coins accepted.

For a reader in a country where app stores or card payments are restricted, the absence of a price on the homepage matters. The site does not say whether a paid tier exists, what it would cost or how to pay for it, and it does not say whether the apps are available where the usual app stores are blocked.

What the site does not settle

Much is left open. There is no named audit of the logging claim, and the claim itself is one sentence. The protocols are described only as open-source and stealthy, without names. The 150 million and 50,000 figures come without dates or methods. The site does not say where Brave New Software Project is based, which laws it operates under, or how the Resellers program relates to the donation appeal. It does not say whether use is free, and it does not say which countries the service is tested in.

What the homepage does make clear is the design aim: Lantern is built for getting through blocking, with a large and changing pool of IP addresses, traffic meant to look ordinary, and apps for every major platform including Linux. It is run by a named nonprofit that asks users for donations rather than advertising a subscription. It suits a reader whose main problem is a blocked network and who values a tool built around that. It suits less well a reader who wants a documented logging policy, a named audit, a server list or streaming support before installing.

More in VPNs That Work Under Censorship

See all